"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."
--Joseph Stalin

Friday, August 31, 2012

Mitt Romney's Acceptance Speech

Will Malven 8/31/2012 Mitt delivered a great speech. Was it an earthquake? No, but it was great and it was more than enough to accomplish its goals.

I see nothing now standing in the way of Romney's election. President Obama has been an abysmal failure . . . especially as a leader . . . the single most essential characteristic in a president.

No one can doubt whether Mitt is a leader, he has spent his entire career "leading" people.

Romney by 10%

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Ann Romney's RNC Speech

Will Malven

Magnificent speech by a magnificent lady. No "for the first time in my life I'm proud of being an American . . ." crap, this woman loves America, loves people, and loves he husband. Ann Romney sounds like all those "soccer moms."

What a world of difference from that angry, bitter liberal voice that we heard in 2008. I'm sure Michelle Obama is a great mother and supportive of her husband, but she has NEVER come off as someone pleasant to be around . . . angry people rarely are.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Mark Rubio's RNC Convention Speech

Will Malven

Another magnificent speech - another of the spectacular young Republicans in Congress and standing in the wings to assume the mantle of leadership.  Times may be hard and America may have a long pull back to where we were before President Obama's presidency and before the Democrat Party took over both houses of Congress

One of the great lines: "Our problem isn't that he's [President Obama] a bad person, it's that he's a bad President."

The future is looking bright for the Republican Party.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Paul Ryan's 2012 RNC Convention Speech

Will Malven

This was magnificent and devastating for the Obama camp.  Filled with the truth--backed up with the facts--Ryan truly hits this one out of the park.  I pity Obama and his own choice for VP, Biden.

Absolutely magnificent stuff. This is the face of the RNC of the future, he and Rubio and West--the new "Young Guns" of the Republican Party.

By the way . . . who the candidate chooses as a running mate, says a lot about who they are.  Romney picked one of the most competent, knowledgeable, respected, and accomplished men in Congress, Obama chose a buffoon. 

Biden has always tried to play the role of the affable, regular guy, man-of-the-people.  Instead he comes off as nasty, snarky, out of touch, and sometimes just totally oblivious.

Romney picked a man who has demonstrated that he has the depth of knowledge and competence to step into the job the next day and was not concerned with being outshone by his running mate.

Obama chose someone to make himself look good and who would be utterly asea in the White House (almost as far asea as Obama himself).

One of the money lines - "the man assumed office almost four years ago, isn't it about time he assumed responsibility?"  BAM!  There it goes.

Romney by 10% . . . Watch for it.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Another Reagan: Warning Us About "Obamacare" (socialized medicine)

Will Malven

Fifty-one years ago Ronald Reagan was warning us about the Barack Obamas of the world. How prophetic, how sage, how relevant today.

How much we miss you President Reagan.  How right you were.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Ronald Reagan: A Time For Choosing

Will Malven

Here's another classic.  Again, it's as relevant today as it was in 1964:

What more can I say?

 Oh yeah, Romney/Ryan by 10%.

 Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Ronald Reagan/George H.W. Bush: Morning In America

Will Malven

Thought it was about time to revisit this gem.  Seems as applicable today as it was back in 1980.

More coming.  The panic is setting in.

The left is becoming more unhinged daily.

Romney by 10% is looking better and better.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Brooks' Folly - Is It Satire If You Audience Misses The Joke?

Will Malven

David Brooks, The New York Times' resident Beltway "Conservative" has published a "biography of Mitt Romney" which has his liberal readers gushing with praise and hoping that, finally, he will complete his transition from conservative to liberal Beltway Pundit.

Certainly at first blush, Our Mr. Brooks appears to have skewered Mitt Romney.  In the article, one will find hyperbolic versions of every liberal myth one can imagine, each used to paint a twisted vision of Mr. Romney and his family consistent with the Democrat Party's and President Obama's hilariously absurd narrative.

Here's a clue, liberal of New York City and the world, he's laughing AT you, NOT WITH you.  It is not Romney who is being skewered, it is all you liberals out there with your absurd attempts to smear a man who is so squeaky clean he makes most of us feel squeamish about our own lives. 

Brooks has just pointed out how pathetic the Democrat Campaign machine is.  Whether it's the MSM carrying water for the Obama Administration by repeating the ridiculous charges they are recklessly tossing out, or the Obama Campaign surrogates like Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Stephanie Cutter spreading lies that simply lack any credibility.  In their cases, it's the blonde leading the blonde.

Here's a snippet, but it's really worth following the link and reading the whole thing--especially the comments.  Talk about liberals being oblivious . . .

The Real Romney

Published: August 27, 2012

The purpose of the Republican convention is to introduce America to the real Mitt Romney. Fortunately, I have spent hours researching this subject. I can provide you with the definitive biography and a unique look into the Byronic soul of the Republican nominee:

Mitt Romney was born on March 12, 1947, in Ohio, Florida, Michigan, Virginia and several other swing states. He emerged, hair first, believing in America, and especially its national parks. He was given the name Mitt, after the Roman god of mutual funds, and launched into the world with the lofty expectation that he would someday become the Arrow shirt man. 

Romney was a precocious and gifted child. He uttered his first words (“I like to fire people”) at age 14 months, made his first gaffe at 15 months and purchased his first nursery school at 24 months. The school, highly leveraged, went under, but Romney made 24 million Jujubes on the deal. 

Mitt grew up in a modest family. His father had an auto body shop called the American Motors Corporation, and his mother owned a small piece of land, Brazil. He had several boyhood friends, many of whom owned Nascar franchises, and excelled at school, where his fourth-grade project, “Inspiring Actuaries I Have Known,” was widely admired.

(cont'd at link)
I love to see liberals put on such an awesome display of "didn't get it."  It simply demonstrates how extreme and warped their world view is, that they can read Brooks' article and completely miss the point--because it so closely parallels their preconceived beliefs about . . . Republicans . . . DUM-DUM-DAH!

The live such cloistered lives that they never interact with anyone but those with whom they agree--in fact they eschew those they encounter who do not hold the same views.  Liberals are the least tolerant of folks and they hate anyone who doesn't agree with them.

Great column, David!  Hilarious comments, I believe I only saw one in which the poster actually snapped to what you were doing.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!

Friday, August 24, 2012

Israeli Television: Obama Interfering In Internal Israeli Affairs

Will Malven

This is rather disturbing--especially considering the possible "fallout" (seriously, no pun intended) should Iran finally come to possess a nuclear weapons capability.

I know this is election time and we are all supposed to be focused on domestic politics and the economy, but it is good, occasionally, to step back and examine the other activities in this destructive, anti-American, anti-liberty White House.

Arutz-Sheeva is reporting that President Obama has been using the Israeli papers to interfere with the foreign policy wishes of the Israeli government--and prevent a successful Israeli attack against Iran.

Obama 'Using Israeli Paper to Foil Iran Strike'

Makor Rishon: IDF identifies U.S. "preventive action" against Israeli attack in collusion with Israeli pundits.

By Gil Ronen
First Publish: 8/24/2012, 11:55 AM

The United States is colluding with a top Israeli newspaper to stymie Israel's efforts to strike Iran's nuclear weapons program, and the IDF knows it, according to a leading nationalist pundit.

Writing in Friday's edition of Makor Rishon, one of the Israel's veteran journalists, Amnon Lord, paints a picture of intense U.S. meddling in internal Israeli political and security-oriented processes in an effort to prevent a successful Israeli strike on the weapon program meant to make it extinct.

"From a technical military point of view, Israel does not require any kind of coordination with the Americans," writes Lord regarding the plan for a raid on Iran. "There is a concern that the Americans will learn of the date for an attack and try to prevent it in different ways. The Americans have not given the Israelis a feeling that they are true partners in the operative arena, in the past two years. On the contrary, the IDF has identified preventive American activity against an Iran operation."

"This is particularly evident in the grave matter of the leaks regarding Azerbaijan in the past, about the Kurdish region, and recently in the publication of the flight paths to the target. All this is being produced by our ally, with the cooperation of one of the largest media platforms in Israel, which serves and assists the Obama administration against the government of Israel. The Americans are the ones who are feeding some of the arch-pundits with damaging information."

(cont'd at link)
With the Middle East already a rumbling powder-keg of fledgling regimes, some (most?) turning to Islamic extremism, as in Egypt (a stellar Obama success story--sitting and watching as a formerly stable state descends into chaos and then turns to radical Islam--only jumping on the bandwagon at the last second in a sad attempt to garner political credit), nothing the Obama Administration is doing is consistent with our traditional policies towards Israel and Islamic extremists, or our still stated policy.

This is just further evidence of Obama's incompetence in handling dangerous international situations and his inability to grasp the importance and critical nature of what's occurring in the Middle East--or it is evidence of something more sinister (but less likely), President Obama wishes Iran to possess a nuclear weapons capability, because he agrees with the wishes of the Islamic Caliphate in Iran and is hostile to Israel's survival.

I tend to think Obama really is as incompetent and ignorant as he appears.  His actions (or inaction) when events began to occur in Egypt and during the initial stages of the Libyan popular uprising amounted to that same "sitting and watching" but then, Obama excels at "sitting and watching" as other struggle against despots--or pretty much anything else of import which occurs.

Obama is at heart, a "sitter and watcher," not a "doer" or "accomplisher."  He's a follower, not a leader.  He is incapable of making decision and of directing policy--this is what happens with you elect someone with no experience and no record of accomplishment.  This is what happens when you elect an academic rather than a successful real-world achiever.

President Obama allowed Nancy Pelosi and Congressional Democrats to write "Obamacare" with little input from him other than to rubber-stamp what Pelosi et al put into it.  He allowed House Democrats to dictate the stimulus package and he allowed European leaders to take the initiative when Libya first began to show signs of rebellion.

We know that Obama is a follower, not a leader and we know that he likes and has attempted to get close to both Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez, two of the worst, most repressive leaders in the world.

Small wonder Hillary refused to step in as a VP replacement for Joe Biden's job--She has seen first hand just how incoherent and inept the White House is in handling foreign policy . . . and his failures reflect badly back upon her for attempting to enact Obama's badly flawed policies.

So who is it in the White House that hates Israel enough to leak secret mission intel to the press in their attempt to derail the Israelis and help Iran obtain nukes?   Is Valerie Jarrett the anti-semite, or is it someone pulling the strings from the outside like the notorious Nazi collaborator George Soros?

Just a reminder of who Americans actually elected back in 2008. 

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Caught Lying: "It Doesn't Matter"

Will Malven

How does one hold a rational debate with a person so lacking in any sense of morality that she is unashamed when she is caught lying in a television interview?   How does one debate a complete sociopath who will say anything about anyone without regard to facts just to score points?

Worse, what does it say about that person, about their honesty, their veracity, their sense of right and wrong, their sense of obligation to the truth, their sense of honor?

Katie Pavlich, News Editor over at Townhall has a video of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz being confronted with her lies by Anderson Cooper and dismissing the fact as irrelevant.  I'm just going to link to the article and embed the video.  For Katie's comments and to see the full text of DWS's dishonest fundraising email, follow the link.

Anderson Cooper Shreds DWS For Lying About Romney Abortion Position

Katie Pavlich
News Editor, Townhall 

(cont'd at link)

How twisted must a person's thinking be for her to be able to sit there and lie repeatedly and barefacedly, even when confronted by her own self-contradictory words.  How does a voter ever trust a person without conscience, without compunction, without honor?

Is this really the face (please no comments) that the Democrat Party believes America will agree with, sympathize with?  Has the mainstream Democrat Party moved so far to the left that they believe the American people aren't offended when they are lied to--that they won't know or care that an elected representative is willing to lie to them about serious matters just to win elections and doesn't even have the decency to be ashamed when she is caught?

Democrats love to claim that Mitt Romney is "out of touch" with the average citizen--in fact they are now making that claim about both Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, because they are white males, wealthy, and conservative.  Yet Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Chairwoman of the entire Democrat National Committee is a sociopathic liar who thinks her lying "isn't important."

The woman thinks being caught lying isn't important and the Republicans are out of touch???  Maybe lying to voters and feeling no guilt at being caught is common in the social circles in which Wasserman-Schultz circulates, but most Americans are repelled by such blatant disregard for the truth, such a willingness to deceive others and such a contemptuous dismissal when caught (even though they may indulge in the occasional white lie themselves, most people have the decency to be embarrassed when caught).

I applaud the Democrat Party for finally admitting what we conservatives and Republicans have been saying for decades--Democrats and liberals are pathological liars who feel no compunction in deceiving people to achieve their socialist political agenda.

It's nice to have the HEAD OF THE ENTIRE DNC confirm what we've been saying all this time

. . . You want truth and solutions (and individual liberty), vote for Republicans and conservatives. 

You want lies and hot air (and a socialist state), vote for Democrats and liberals.

Democrats are liars--at least their party leadership.  I've proven it a number of times on this blog.  Barack Hussein Obama is a liar, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is a liar, Harry Reid is a liar, Barbara Boxer is a liar, Al Franken is a liar, Nancy Pelosi is a liar, Valerie Jarrett is a liar, Eric Holder is a criminal and a liar . . . liar, liar, liar, liar . . . time and again these people are caught in the most blatant lies and distortions and have remained so unrepentant and unembarrassed that their ability to win elections is really impressive.

To be able to deceive the voters with such alacrity and without so much as a hint of compunction is a fascinating--but frightening--thing to watch and to ponder as they sit in positions of power--power they wish to exercise over their fellow citizens.

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!  The Democrats will lie you into subjugation and slavery to the state.  Your liberty and freedom is at grave risk.

Long Live The American Republic!!!!

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Team Obama's Economic Sleight-Of-Hand

Will Malven

I'm not much for factcheck.org or any of the other so-called fact checking pages as they have a definite leftward lean--not terribly so, but I have seen some pretty long-limbed reaches on their parts attempting to rationalize some dodgy data on Obama.   However they do manage a fair job of keeping liberals honest--especially when the claims are sufficiently outrageous as to be blatant lies.

So here is an analysis from June looking at Obama's jobs numbers claims.

Obama’s Economic Sleight of Hand

Obama's Jobs Numbers--The Truth

Will Malven

This is just too good an analysis not to share with everyone.

It comes to us from the "Political Math" blog (I linked to his analysis of Rick Perry job numbers--last entry in the "must read" column on the left).

From it, we can get a graphic understanding of the jobs each President created since Truman.  It's dated June of this year (which means I need to visit that website more often).

Romney, Obama, and Executive Job Records

 politicalmath | June 13, 2012

Recently President Obama’s team has felt that attacking Romney’s jobs record in Massachusetts tests well in the sample group.

These attacks got me thinking about executive job records.  “Where” I asked myself  “would President Obama place in a ranking of US Presidents in terms of job creation?”

You can also download a larger version of the chart. I find it difficult to create visualizations that work well in both blog form and Facebook-sharing form. This was my attempt at a compromise.

Is this a fair comparison? Yes and no. Part of the Goose/Gander series is that I create a provocative visual and then explain in more details what is fair and isn’t fair about it.

(cont'd at link)
Now, as with all analyses, there are a number of caveats to go with it and he cites the problems on his page.

The Big Lie Democrats are telling (funny how fascists always use the same tactics) American citizens is their claimed number of new jobs created.  I've heard repeated claims--the latest from Stephanie Cutter yesterday--that "Obama has created 4.3 million jobs."

Democrats believe if you repeat a lie loud enough and often enough people believe it's the truth.  The questionable technique Democrats are using is to begin counting "new jobs" created from the lowest employment levels achieved in 2009 (when unemployment reached over 10%) and move forward from there.  The problem is, that fails to account for the millions of jobs shed--also under Obama and the Democrats gentle tutelage.

The truth:  The economy began going south under GWB, not due to any of his policies nor to those of Republicans in Congress--though it is more than fair to attack them mercilessly for the reckless amount of spending they indulged in prior to  2007 when Democrats took over the reins of both houses of Congress.

What Republicans did to excess, Democrats then put into overdrive.  After their initial budgets in FY 2008 and FY 2009 Democrats figured out that--under the current policy of "base-line budgeting"--if they NEVER PASSED A BUDGET, all of that spending was AUTOMATICALLY INCLUDED in the next year's budgeting.  The result, four consecutive years of TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICITS.

Add to all of that spending, an insane policy which forced banks to lend money to millions of prospective home-buyers WHO COULDN'T AFFORD THE PAYMENTS and were never suited for home ownership.  When Democrats were confronted with the inevitable difficulties such an insane policy would cause, they simply denied all problems and refused to act.

When all of those house loans built of dead paper collapsed it took the economy with it.

As Blogger Political Math says, no president has any real control over the economy, what he provides is LEADERSHIP and President Obama has provided NONE throughout his entire term in office.

Anyway, enjoy the data and the arguments it leads to.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Republicans: Postpone NOW!

Will Malven

So alright, I know they don't read or listen to me, but really Republican leadership, stop dawdling and postpone the national convention TODAY!

Republican Convention Threatened by Storm


Tropical storm Isaac, which is gathering strength in the Caribbean, could strike Florida, hurricane forecasters say, triggering concern it might force a postponement or cancellation of the Republican National Convention in Tampa next week.

It is still too early to predict whether the storm could make a direct hit on the city. Forecast models show Isaac's center following a path that could take it as far west as the Gulf of Mexico and as far east as the Atlantic Ocean by next Monday.

Putting off the inevitable is foolish and only plays into the belief that many of us hold that our Republican Party leadership is a bunch of indecisive, wishy-washy incompetents.  They should have made this decision yesterday, but--NOPE-- they are still "considering their options."

The storm is coming and there is sufficient probability that the storm will strike Tampa during the convention that the time for consideration is past.  It's time to act.

MOVE, damnit!  Make a decision.  Postponement not only prevents a disastrous convention interrupted by a hurricane, but it removes all of the attacks Democrats plan to make playing off whatever is said there and it allows Republicans to avail themselves of the same opportunity. 

It is a win, win, win situation for Republicans and the sooner they make the call, the less disruptive it will be to attendees and to planned events.


Issue a statement carefully laying the safety and security concerns involved with holding the convention as the hurricane approaches, then announce that Republicans will hold their convention the week AFTER the Democrat Convention.

Alternatively, them might pull a Joe Biden, and refuse to obey the unwritten rules governing candidate behavior and . . . hold the Republican convention AT THE SAME TIME AS THE DEMOCRAT CONVENTION. 

Heh, heh, heh . . . that night be a suitable response (nah, I guess that would be seen by the public as too in your face and political).

At any rate, I sure wish Reince Priebus and the rest of the Republican leadership would get their acts together.

Hey guys, it might look silly if for some reason the storm chose a different track, but a lot less silly that being caught in Tampa in the middle of a hurricane, because your afraid of how it would be seen by the press.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Teleprompter In Chief? Now We Have Proof!

Will Malven

Well, I have to admit it, I never thought we'd have the proof.  Many of us have made fun of President Obama's painfully obvious dependency on the use of teleprompters, even under extraordinary circumstances, and ridiculed that dependency in various ways.  The most commonly used expression for this odd dependence was to call President Obama "The Teleprompter in Chief."

Now, thanks to Reuters, we have proof of just how accurate that name truly is.  Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you . . . (drum roll) . . .


This is our President caught in an unexpected, candid moment, sans makeup.  Here we see that he is indeed . . . a teleprompter.  

Also, you can see proof that this is a candid photo and the President was not prepared--he is completely blank at the moment (word has it he was waiting for his handlers--primarily Valerie Jarrett--to send him what he was to say.

LOL!!!  Enjoy!!! 

Long Live Our America Republic!!!!

Romney Raising Big Bucks In "Obama Territory"

Will Malven

Hot-headed Obama can't be happy about this.

Apparently Mitt Romney is raising goodly sums of campaign cash in areas of the country that have been highly lucrative to the Obama fundraising efforts in the past--note:  I'm not saying that Obama is suffering in those same areas (I lack the data to determine that), just that Romney is having significant success in raising funds from the exclusive neighborhoods of the economic and intellectual "elite," which have been far more friendly to Obama in the past.

I can only link to the original article, because of AP draconian copyright policies (if I had another source, I'd use it). 

Romney raising funds with great success in New York, San Francisco, LA, Chicago, etc. and the donations are coming both small and large.  This, combined with the amount of money Romney is bringing in--especially now that Ryan has joined the ticket--has got to worry Team Obama and the Democrat machine.

Be prepared for Democrats and Obama to try and double-down on the lame "there's too much money in politics" routine.  We will hear a lot of stories that the amount of money Romney is spending in his campaign is "bad for the country," or "bad for our elective process," or some such hypocritical nonsense.

Just a year ago, Team Obama and the MSM were loudly and excitedly proclaiming that Obama would raise $1 Billion for his reelection campaign.  Back then, money wasn't bad, it was helping Obama to bring "Hope and Change" to America.  Obama had no problem in his 2008 breaking his personal pledge to remain within the federal campaign funding limits as soon as he discovered he would be successful at fundraising (just as he felt no compunction at breaking his pledge to hold 12 townhall type debates with McCain--I guess Obama's word is nothing but hot air).

We are going to hear Obama's MSM surrogates make a big deal over this and the amount of money Romney is raising and spending.  Oh the outrage, oh the crime, oh . . . all that empty hot air.

Romney by 10%

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Questions Arise On Obama Budgeting - Campaign Running Deficits

Will Malven

No surprise here.  LOL!!!

The Obama Campaign has now spent more money than it has coming in.  Sound familiar to anyone watching our economy go deeper and deeper into debt? Sounds a lot like the Democrat strategy of the past 3 1/2 years.

Obama campaign's spending outpaces its fundraising

By Fredreka Schouten and Christopher Schnaars

WASHINGTON – As Election Day approaches, President Obama is burning through campaign money faster than he can collect it — exceeding his spending pace at this stage of the 2008 contest as he expands his field operation and trades combative ads on the airwaves with Republican rival Mitt Romney.

By contrast, President Bush had spent $205.4 million to retain the White House at this point in the 2004 election.

The Democratic National Committee also stepped up its spending on the president's behalf last month, burning through $32 million — more than double what the national party spent a month earlier, as it undertook fresh rounds of polling and advertising to help Obama.
(cont'd at link)
So now, the big question:  How are we to trust Obama to save the economy, control deficit spending, and correct the damage done during his first administration IF HE CAN'T EVEN RUN HIS CAMPAIGN'S BUDGET???

Huh?  How's that liberals?  Obama's running a deficit in his campaign, but he can't even control his spending under those circumstances--and he wants us to trust him to undo what he has done already???  Really?

How stupid do you think the American voters are? [I'd advise you not to tell the truth when you answer that, liberals, it might cost you even more elections.]

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Mr. Foreign Policy? Barack Obama Ad Throws Switzerland Under The Bus

Will Malven

The Obama team likes to tout the President's credentials and achievements in foreign policy . . . see, they think that alienating our closest allies and cozying up to the least democratic and least friendly regimes is "good foreign policy."

So there should be little surprise that, in their zeal to attack Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney, the highly praised and touted "Team Obama" have released an ad which our close friends the in Switzerland find highly offensive.

Oh, don't take my word for it, just follow read the snippet and follow the link.

Switzerland objects to Obama campaign film slur

Switzerland hit back Tuesday at a US presidential election campaign video that portrays the country as a tax haven.

In the video, a character named Miss Swiss Bank Account describes the Republican candidate Mitt Romney as a "boss millionaire with accounts everywhere", the ATS news agency reported.

The film gives "the impression that having a bank account in Switzerland is dubious in itself and its only aim is to hide money from the tax authorities," Switzerland's Federal Department for Foreign Affairs (DFAE) said.

(cont'd at link)
Liberals and Democrats have, from the outset of Obama's national political career, claimed him as one of the "best and brightest" of us and they made the same claim for the cabal of incompetents surrounding him.   The American people have seen little evidence of it--especially when it comes to foreign affairs.

Gaff after gaff, blunder after blunder, obsequious bow after obsequious bow, the world famous "Team Obama" caromed its way from one situation to the next like a drunk reeling down a hallway.

This is just another sad chapter in his Keystone Kops administration.

Hey Mr. President what ally are you going to offend tomorrow?  What dictator are you going to bow to next?

Long Live Our American Republic?

Obama Caught Attacking The Cuts His Plan Makes

Will Malven

It just keeps getting better and better, y'all (mandatory southern drawl for you "furin" visitors).

TownHall Political Editor Guy Benson's been having a field day with the Obama contradictions (Obamadictions? O'Contradictions?).  Obama's statements in the past directly contradict his own policies and current day statements.

Pure Gold: Obama Blasts Medicare Cuts to Fund New Healthcare Program

Guy Benson
Political Editor, Townhall.com

We generally try to reserve the "pure gold" label for truly irresistible instances of flagrant hypocrisy and irony.  To wit, our last usage came while flagging a clip of President Obama ripping into President Bush's "unpatriotic" accumulation of $4 Trillion in debt over eight years ... just after Obama eclipsed the $4 Trillion mark himself after just two-and-a-half years on the job.  That reminder seems especially relevant this week, since we now find ourselves on the precipice of blowing past the $16 trillion national debt mark.  It'll probably happen by week's end.  In any case, and without further ado, here's candidate Barack Obama in 2008 informing voters about John McCain's risky and dangerous Medicare-slashing vision for healthcare reform:

Did you notice at around 1:20 this "Harvard Law School suma cum laude graduate, Editor of the Harvard Law Review" said:

". . . a ill-conceived . . ."


". . .a ill-conceived . . . ?" Really Mr. Harvard Law School honors graduate? Is that the type of grammar they use at Harvard? 

That is an often repeated error whenever Mr. Obama speaks--and no, he's not trying to speak in some vernacular--it is an unconscious verbal pattern that belies the claims made as to his academic prowess.

I think maybe


Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Monday, August 20, 2012

More Republican IDIOCY

Will Malven

Hard to believe that any grown man would think that disrobing in public for a nude swim--WHILE ACTING IN THE PURSUIT OF HIS JOB AS A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES--is acceptable behavior . . . but . . . that's precisely what (IDIOT) Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-Kan.) did, while on a fact finding mission to Israel.

Not only is his behavior an offense to common sense and proper behavior, but it is disrespectful of our closest Middle Eastern ally, Israel.  It shows an appalling lack awareness as to how a politicians behavior is always under scrutiny, and an astounding lack of self-discipline, moral rectitude, consideration for others present--INCLUDING THE DAUGHTER OF ONE OF HIS COLLEAGUES.

Exclusive: FBI probed GOP trip with drinking, nudity in Israel

8/19/12 8:09 PM EDT

The FBI probed a late-night swim in the Sea of Galilee that involved drinking, numerous GOP freshmen lawmakers, top leadership staff — and one nude member of Congress, according to more than a dozen sources, including eyewitnesses.

During a fact-finding congressional trip to the Holy Land last summer, Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-Kan.) took off his clothes and jumped into the sea, joining a number of members, their families and GOP staff during a night out in Israel, the sources told POLITICO. Other participants, including the daughter of another congressman, swam fully clothed, while some lawmakers partially disrobed. More than 20 people took part in the late-night dip in the sea, according to sources who were participants in the trip.
(cont'd at link)
As a recovering alcoholic, I can say with certainty that anyone who can't control their behavior under the influence of alcohol--definitely has a drinking problem. I can't say if this idiot is also an alcoholic, only he can do that, but I can say he has no business representing the citizens of America if he can't even properly represent himself.

Sorry guys, I have no patience with idiocy of this magnitude and of such a glaring nature. This guy needs to apologize and then step down. His behavior and his inability to make good decisions make him unsuitable to be in Congress (I should say the same about Harry Reid and most of the Democrats in Congress) but beyond that, as a conservative I resent being represented by idiots.

Hey Yoder, take the train. Leave now.

What is it about politicians that they think they can get away with the most offensive and dumbest behavior without repercussions? Surely they can't all be that naive and oblivious.

There is some flaw in whatever particular combination of genes propels individuals to seek a career in politics--whether for power or out of some sense of higher calling--which causes, in a small percentage of its progeny, the particularly self-destructive combination of arrogance and rank stupidity.  Clearly both Congressman Yoder and Congressman Akin are so cursed.

Allow me to give all of you politicians a clue: YOU ARE ALWAYS ON CAMERA. You got that? You represent your fellow citizens at all times. Your stupid, rude, idiotic, offensive behavior ALWAYS reflect back on your constituents.

If you haven't yet figured that out, it's about time you do. Such stupidity is inexcusable. People like you, Mr. Yoder, and Todd Akin should be staked out in a field and left for the vultures as a warning to the painfully stupid.

(Sorry, I just can't abide this level of stupidity, no matter where it occurs)

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Akin Must Go!

Will Malven

Stuck in a bewildering whirlwind of anger, astonishment, incredulity, frustration, sadness, and just plain "tired of it."  For every great Republican, like Paul Ryan, there's an idiot, like Akin.

I am as conservative as they come.  I believe that the Constitution is as close to being a perfect document as mankind has ever produced and that it's principles are timeless and as relevant and as applicable today as they were the day it was penned.  I believe in the American economic model of free enterprise capitalism.  I believe in the sanctity of life.  I believe that abortion is wrong and that it is the taking of an innocent human life--and further, that abortion should not ever be used solely as a form of birth control.

Having said all of that, there is absolutely no excuse for a man as clueless and insensitive as Todd Akin to be allowed to remain as the Missouri Republican senatorial candidate.  Not only were his remarks insensitive to the needs and well-being of rape victims, but--not to put too fine a point on it--demonstrated an astounding lack of cognizance as to the political sensitivity of the subject of rape and the political ramifications of making such a profoundly ignorant and stupid remark.

GOP Senate candidate says he ‘misspoke’ with ‘legitimate rape’ comment

Liz Goodwin, Yahoo! News | The Ticket – 11 hrs ago

Sen. Claire McCaskill is probably having a pretty good Sunday. Her opponent in the Missouri Senate race, Republican Rep. Todd Akin, has spent most of the day backtracking after saying that victims of "legitimate rape" cannot biologically become pregnant and thus do not need access to legal abortions.

"First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy after rape] is really rare," Akin told KTVI-TV in defense of his stand that rape victims should not be allowed to access abortions. "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."

Akin said that even if a rape victim does somehow become pregnant, "I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child."
Even if I didn't disagree with his beliefs (exceptions for rape and incest must always be included in any effort to place limits on or ban abortion, out of consideration for the mental and physical health of victims of such heinous crimes), for a man to be so ignorant and to preach such nonsense as he did with his comment that pregnancy was "unlikely" in cases of rape--especially in this day and age--is inexcusable. Even worse, Akin didn't even have the courage of his (claimed) convictions. At the first sign of resistance, he abandoned his position without even token resistance. Absolutely inexcusable.

Perhaps, Mr. Akin, you should put down your bible and whatever extreme interpretations you have of it, and study a little biology.


Oh yeah.  One more thing.  BE A MAN.  You didn't "misspeak," sir, you stated your own ignorant, insensitive, offensive, (did I say ignorant?), pathetic opinion.  Stop trying to wiggle out of it.  You said it, if you believe it then say so and walk away.

I'm am so tired of politicians who lack the courage of their convictions.  It is apparent that both parties are populated with spineless weasels who will say and do anything just to get elected.  I'd have more respect for Mr. Akin if he had stuck to his guns.

IF YOUR GOING TO LOSE, DO IT LIKE A MAN--but Mr. Akin even lacks that strength of character.

Sarah Palin endorsed Sarah Steelman--I don't normally go by the endorsements of outside celebrities, but sense I lack any detailed information on the possible replacements for Akin, Palin's word is good enough for me.  She was right about Ted Cruz.

I'm glad to see the Romney Campaign and other Republicans quickly distance themselves from this lunatic.  I could have wished the Romney response had been worded more strongly, but at least it was immediate.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Update: Corrected for misspelling Congressman Akin's name, sorry folks.

Friday, August 17, 2012

Mystery Republican Named For Democrat National Convention

Will Malven

HAH!!!   I'm not kidding here, folks.   The big mystery of who the "big-named Republican" Dems plan to feature during their national convention next month has apparently been revealed.

Lincoln Chaffee is going to place President Obama's name in nomination for re-election to the presidency.  No, I'm serious here.  Now, primarily in a pathetically weak response to Artur Davis' announcement that he would stump for Romney in his home state, the DNC has announced who their special guest will be.

The Democrats were bragging about this a couple of weeks ago--that they were going to have some mysterious, big-named Republican featured at their convention in September.  Speculation began immediately in Republican circles as to who the "big-named Republican" would be.  [Wanna know something funny?  Lincoln Chaffee's name never came up.  He was never reliably Republican enough or important enough to be considered a "big-named Republican."]

This is just too funny.

Ex-GOP senator to attend Dem convention

8/17/12 10:28 AM EDT

In response to the news that Artur Davis, the former Alabama Democratic congressman, will speak at the Republican National Convention, Democrats can now point to their own get – Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee.

From WPRI’s Ted Nesi:
Lincoln Chafee’s political migration is complete – eight years after he was a VIP at the 2004 Republican National Convention, next month he’ll be one at the Democratic National Convention.

Chafee’s office confirmed Thursday that the independent governor will attend “a couple of nights of the convention,” which takes place Sept. 3-6 in Charlotte, N.C., to formally nominate President Obama for a second term. “Not sure which ones yet,” Chafee spokeswoman Christine Hunsinger told WPRI.com in an email.
Chafee’s appearance at the Democratic convention won’t exactly come as a surprise: he left the GOP some time ago. He also appeared on an Obama campaign conference call this week.

(cont'd at link)
Look, I know Democrats plans for Chaffee predate Congressman Davis' announcement, but this hurried roll-out is their attempt to counter any impact Davis' defection might have.  Don't you just love liberal logic?

Senator Chaffee was NEVER in the mainstream of the Republican Party, Artur Davis was the man who seconded Obama's nomination, he was CO-CHAIRMAN of Obama's election campaign in 2008.  He wasn't just one of a crowd of Democrat Congressman, he was at the very heart of the Obama operation.

Chaffee counter-balances Artur Davis . . . only in the fevered, dimly lit imaginations of the Democrat Party leadership.   Chaffee has been totally out of the picture for 8 years and even before that, no Republicans took him seriously (except for the simple souls in his home state).

For Democrats to actually have the sort of impact they fantasize  about, their special guest would have to be someone like Liz Cheney (not in this lifetime :) ), Cofer Black (equally as likely), or Beth Myers (again, about as likely as snow here in Houston tomorrow).

Nope, this is just another in a long line of Democrat Party "FAILS."  Democrats need to stick with what they know, pandering, lying, and demagoguing.  That's far more familiar territory for them (Oh! . . . and slanderous accusations, as well--don't want to forget those).

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Family Research Council Shooting: Suddenly Media Not Ready to Blame Politics for a Mad Gunman’s Crimes

Will Malven

I ran across this article by Warner Todd Huston over at WizBang.  Not much for me to add, Warner covers it all pretty thoroughly.  Here's an excerpt, follow the link in the title to read the whole article, it really lays out the obvious leftward bias of the major news organizations in covering these tragic events.

Family Research Council Shooting: Suddenly Media Not Ready to Blame Politics for a Mad Gunman’s Crimes

Curiously enough, the August 15 shooting of a security guard at the Washington HQ of the Family Research Council perpetrated by an unhinged gay rights activist didn’t spark the same hyperbolic claims from the Old Media establishment that politics is at the root of this violence, a claim that permeated reportage of past violence. No calls for investigations were made, no individual politicians were accused of fostering a “violent atmosphere,” and no particular ideology was blamed as the cause of this crime.

Quite unlike every recent shooting that happened before it, crimes that were immediately blamed on the evil, evil Tea Party, or conservatives, or even Rush Limbaugh, this shooting was treated in a subdued manner by Old Media and was practically ignored by the ignorati and talking heads of the lefty establishment.

The coverage was downright muted, for certain. It got so absurd that Jonah Goldberg had to come back from vacation to make a post at NRO’s The Corner to point out one of the most egregious headlines in the Old Media. It came from the Washington Post whose headline on iPad read, “Police: Suspect disagreed with Family Research Council.”

Quipped Goldberg:
“Disagreed”? The suspect shot someone. “Disagreed”!? Why so bombastic? Why not say that the would-be killer “had a different perspective’
(continued at link)

Barbara Comstock.

Obama's Compassionate Liberalism? Ask His Brother

Will Malven

Here's another source of information for voters on who Obama truly is.

To listen to him speak, one would think that Obama is a man who cares deeply for the American people and especially for those less fortunate than he . . . but the best way to know who a man truly is and how he will convert his words into action is to look at how he treats his family.  Obama's family, his family of origin--his brothers, sisters, aunts and uncles back in Kenya--apparently don't measure up for President "Hope and Change."

Hey, President Obama, can you spare (your own brother) a dime? . . . Apparently not (link in title).

How I became George Obama's 'brother'

By Dinesh D'Souza
Published August 16, 2012

A few days ago I received a call from a man I recently met named George. He was a bit flustered, and soon informed me that his young son was sick with a chest condition. He pleaded with me to send him $1,000 to cover the medical bills. Since George was at the hospital I asked him to let me speak to a nurse, and she confirmed that George’s son was indeed ill. So I agreed to send George the money through Western Union. He was profusely grateful. But before I hung up I asked George, “Why are you coming to me?” He said, “I have no one else to ask.” Then he said something that astounded me, “Dinesh, you are like a brother to me.”

Actually, George has a real life brother who just happens to be the president of the United States. (George Obama is the youngest of eight children sired by Barack Obama Sr.) George’s brother is a multimillionaire and the most powerful man in the world. Moreover, George’s brother has framed his re-election campaign around the “fair share” theme that we owe obligations to those who are less fortunate.

One of Obama’s favorite phrases comes right out of the Bible: “We are our brother’s keeper.” Yet he has not contributed a penny to help his own brother. And evidently George does not believe, even in times of emergency, that he can turn to his brother in the White House for help.

(continued at link)
What is it they say, "Charity begins at home?" Yeah, something like that. Once more we see the pettiness and coldness of a "true believer" from the left. For some reason, President Obama has deliberately chosen NOT to help his family members in Kenya and has barely even been willing to throw a bone to those who reside here.

What does it say about a man who has the means, the opportunity, and the ability to aid his own family during a time of great difficulty and need, but who won't, because they are politically inconvenient? Is this truly a man Americans want in control of our nation?

Is THIS an example of the "care and compassion" we all can expect from a second Obama term? Is this an example of how he will treat seniors under his newly imposed "Obamacare?"   Is this why the Obama team was comfortable in taking $716 Billion dollars out of Medicare to fund his unwanted health care reform bill?

That $716 Billion comes directly out of compensation payments to doctors and hospitals (health care providers).  Already there is a growing number of doctors who have started refusing to take new Medicare patients, because compensation for Medicare patients is so low that doctors have to make up for it by seeing more patients.  That means less time with each patient, more opportunity for errors, and a lower overall quality of medical care.

Now President Obama and the Democrats have taken an even larger bite out of physician compensation and hospital compensation.  The inevitable result of this disastrous policy will be a huge increase in doctors going "private" or into concierge services (under which one pays a premium just for the privilege of seeing them), refusing to accept new Medicare patients, and fewer overall choices and doctors for seniors--again meaning a lower quality of care.

But then, that's the point of "Obamacare,"isn't it?  To insure that we all live lives of "shared sacrifice" (and of quiet desperation, I think).  That has been the result in every other nation with a single payer plan.

Mitt Romney's plan keeps that $716 Billion in Medicare and puts an end to the ill thought out, ill conceived, poorly executed "Obamacare."

Only Democrats have chosen to take $716 Billion out of Medicare to fund one of their (but not American citizens') pet agenda items.  Only Democrats continue to demagogue on an issue of such importance and the consequences of its failure so great that a solution to its fiscal problems must be addressed honestly.

The Democrat leadership doesn't care about seniors, they only care about tricking them into voting for them with the same old lies and attacks they have used to frighten the elderly for decades.

It ain't gonna work.  Senior citizens are fully engaged these days and they have other sources of information besides the Democrat propaganda organizations in the MSM and AA(D)RP (American Association of (Democrat) Retired Persons).  They are active in the tea party movement and AA(D)RP now has competitors for seniors' money.

American Seniors Association now claims over 13 million members and still growing.  AMAC (Association of Mature American Citizens) is another growing conservative seniors group and Generation America is a third such group.  All three of these organizations are out there telling truth to AA(D)RP's Democrat lies.

Just because someone is old doesn't mean they aren't capable of making good decisions, or seeing through Democrat lies and the polling results show it with Gallop showing that seniors prefer the Ryan plan over the Obama plan by a margin of 48-42.  Bad news for Democrats, good news for Republicans and for seniors.

Romney/Ryan by 10%

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Obama/Democrats Caught In Another Lie

Will Malven

Wow!  It just keeps getting better and better, folks.

Democrats were actually salivating in the first moments following Mitt Romney's announcement naming Paul Ryan as his running mate.  They were certain that they would be able to hang Ryan's plan to reform Medicare around Romney's neck like an albatross and waltz to victory.

My how the worm turns.

The first blow to White House plans was the overwhelming popularity of Ryan's pick with Republicans.  Republicans were instantly rejuvenated and now have an "enthusiasm gap" of over 10% compared to Democrat voters.

Next, was the unexpected tactic of the Romney Campaign to go straight at the President on Medicare by publicizing the fact that "Obamacare" cuts over $700 Billion from Medicare.  Democrats were sputtering mad.  Why, how dare Republicans start telling the truth!

The Obama camp immediately began sending out their flacks in the White House and in the MSM to deny that Obama was cutting Medicare and attack the Romney camp for lying. They immediately began calling the Ryan/WYDEN plan, the Romney-Ryan plan [Interesting approach, no?   Imagine the gall it requires to take a plan that one of your most strident liberals CO-AUTHORED and lay it at the feet of a man who had absolutely nothing to do with it.].  Then they began demagoguing the provisions of the already defunct Ryan plan (it was rejected by the House) with lies, solely intended to frighten senior citizens and convince them that Romney and Ryan were the devil incarnate.  [I find that an interesting behavior coming from "compassionate liberals."]

Meanwhile, as the Obama Campaign busied itself with sending out their Democrat Party and MSM flacks to refute Romney's claim, up pops another one of those "inconvenient" recordings that lying politicians so hate.  It seems that President Barack Hussein Obama not only agreed with the description of "cuts" to Medicare, but confirmed that he would defend those "cuts" against any attempt to eliminate them.

This is from ABC (shocking I know):

President Obama in 2009 Pledged to Veto Attempts to Undo Medicare Cuts

By Jake Tapper

As Democrats attack Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan for their proposals regarding Medicare, Republicans are circulating this clip from a November 9, 2009 interview we had with President Obama in which he not only acknowledged that one third of his health care bill was paid for by cuts to Medicare, but that he would veto attempts to undo those cuts.

Watch the video below. The exchange on Medicare occurs at 2:15:
video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

Oh my! Here you have Robert Reich, Soledad O'Brien ("news anchor" arguing with John Sununu in support of her beloved Obama), and all the rest of them denying there are any cuts and here come the Republicans with that pesky old truth again.

Oh yeah, and what do some of the leading lights in the Democrat Party think of Ryan (when they're not playing election politics, like now)?
  1. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR): “Paul Ryan shares my belief that we don’t hold election certificates to sit on the sidelines and that the only way to tackle some of the big challenges facing our nation is to work together on big solutions.  Paul has also long-shared my view that the best way to hold down health costs is to give all Americans the ability to hire and fire their insurance company.”

  2. Erskine Bowles (former Clinton chief of staff: Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff was a co-chair of President Obama’s deficit commission, on which Ryan served. Bowles sang Ryan’s praises in September 2011 during an event at the University of North Carolina):

    “Have any of you met Paul Ryan?” he asked the audience. “We should get him to come to the university. I’m telling you this guy is amazing. I always thought that I was okay with arithmetic, but this guy can run circles around me. And, he is honest. He is straightforward. He is sincere.”

  3. Rep. Dan Boren (D-OK): Rep. Boren, a Blue Dog Democrat from Oklahoma, is the first cousin of Ryan’s wife, Janna. Though Boren, who is retiring at the end of the year, did not vote for Ryan’s budgets, he has praised his Republican colleague as a man of impeccable character:

    “Paul has a firm moral compass and has always approached his job as a congressman with diligence and honesty.  Having many friends on both sides of the aisle, he is an effective and talented leader. Although we belong in different political parties, I see Paul as a friend, a fellow hunter, and most importantly a family man.”

  4. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL): “I don’t disagree with Paul Ryan saying we have got to look honestly at Medicare,” Durbin said in July 2011. “If we don’t touch Medicare, in about 10 or 12 years, it goes broke. We can’t let that happen.

  5. 5) Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT): “I thank Chairman Ryan for having the courage not just to talk frankly about the danger America’s national debt poses to the American people but also to propose a comprehensive program to cut the national debt.  One does not have to agree with all or most of Chairman Ryan’s proposals to be able to applaud his serious commitment to reduce the debt that threatens our nation’s future.”
Whoops! Looks like maybe Congressman Paul Ryan isn't quite the radical conservative terrorist Democrats are now attempting to portray him as.

More bad news for Democrats, Gallup is now reporting that seniors (those 65 and over) are now polling 48 percent in support of Ryan’s plan over President Obama’s whereas 42 percent back "Obamacare."

I keep telling you folks, Romney by 10%.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Artur Davis, Co-Chair Of Obama's 2008 Campaign To Stump For Romney

Will Malven

This is the biggest news story not being told by the MSM (although, I did find it on the CNN page through Drudge--link in title).

"Former Obama campaign co-chair to stump for Romney

Posted by CNN Political Editor Paul Steinhauser

(CNN) - A former four-term Democratic congressman from Alabama and one time strong supporter of President Barack Obama will campaign for Mitt Romney Wednesday.

A Romney campaign aide confirms to CNN that Artur Davis will stump for the presumptive Republican presidential nominee in the battleground state of Virginia.

Davis, who is black, may be best known for seconding Obama's nomination at the Democratic National Convention in 2008, when he served as an Obama campaign co-chairman. Davis said he had hoped Obama's presidency would make a huge dent in race relations, as well as move the Democratic Party further to the center . . ."
If this was someone as close to Mitt Romney and his campaign in 2008 doing the same thing for President Obama, this would be the lead story on every major network for the next week. We'll just see how fair minded the MSM is in dealing with this story.

As I stated before, I did find it on CNN, now lets just see if it finds its way onto Wolf Blitzer or Candy Crowley's programs.

No wonder the Obama campaign is in panic mode, youths are not supporting Obama in numbers anywhere near 2008 levels (a recent Zogby poll found the the youth vote (those 18-29) support for Obama down 16% from 2008 numbers) and his own people are running away from him as fast as they can.

 I'm telling you folks, it ain't even going to be close. Romney by 10%.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

The "Matrix" Election - "Red Pill" vs. "Blue Pill"

Will Malven

There is a perfect analogy to this coming Presidential Election and that is the scene in "The Matrix" where Morpheus offers Neo the choice: REALITY or THE DREAM.

It is absolutely a perfect fit for the choice we all face this year. Which path do we American citizens want our government to take--do we want to take.

Do we want to face the hard reality of a $17 Trillion national debt (100% of our gross domestic production), a $70 Trillion unfunded liability (in the programs of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security), and annual federal deficits of over $1 Trillion/year for as far as the eye can see?

If so, then vote for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.


Do we want to go on ignoring our problems, allowing the debt to mount up on the backs of our children and their children, watching Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security slowly go bankrupt, and sit by as our BEST IN THE WORLD medical care system is gradually turned into another British National Health Service (a system so bad it is the but of jokes in every television series run on British television?

If that is your vision, the vote to reelect Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

Our choice in this election is just that stark and simple. It's not about tax returns or whether Romney was still at Bain when one of the few businesses they bought just couldn't remain profitable and had to be sold, it's not about all of those distractions and attempts by Democrats to frighten and intimidate voters. Those are all side issues--bunny trails Democrats are attempting to divert us down as they gradually steal our liberties and freedom.

So, America, do we want to sit idly by and watch America as we all know it and love it is transformed into just another failed European state, or do we want to recapture the spirit we all celebrated when Ronald Reagan was president? Will we be that "shining city on the hill," or will we be another nation in which it is the government that wields the power rather than the people?

I ask again, do we want to take the Red Pill, or the Blue Pill?

The choice is yours--and it may well be the most important choice you ever make.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Paul Ryan Explains Our Impending Economic Disaster

Will Malven

Here's a video of Ryan explaining where our economy stands and what will happen if we don't get serious about deficits and spending.  Too bad President Obama and the Democrat Party leadership is more interested in scoring political points and retaining power than they are in helping the American people and saving our economy from a complete collapse.

Need I say more?  Does anyone need to say more?  Well, I'll let Paul Ryan say more.

Here's part 2:

. . . and part 3:

He was asked about President Obama during last year's budget battle.  Here's what he had to say about our Incompetent in Chief:

“Rather than building bridges, he’s [President Obama] poisoning wells.  Exploiting people’s emotions of fear, envy and anxiety is not hope; it’s not change. It’s partisanship. We don’t need partisanship. We don’t need demagoguery. We need solutions. And we don’t need to keep punting to other people to make tough decisions.”
Clearly Paul Ryan "gets" Obama--has him sussed completely--spoke the unspeakable truth . . . Emperor Obama truly doesn't have any clothes.  He's a lacking in solutions and ability as he is in competence.

Romney/Ryan 2012 - America's Last Hope.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

Paul Ryan A Winning Choice

Will Malven

Hoo-yeah, baby! Paul Ryan--fantastic choice.

Here's why--watch as he dismantles Obama and Obama care in 6 minutes (found on Drudge Report):

Man, get a load of Obama's face. I don't think Mr. Ego appreciates being dismantled piece by piece.

Of course everything Ryan said went right over Obama's head. His tiny little brain simply can't handle that level of information and complexity.

Every time I watch the guy, I am in awe that the American people allowed themselves to be so duped by a charlatan like Obama.

Obama will go down as the least competent, least qualified, least capable President in history

Combined with Joe Biden, President Obama and he epitomize DUMB AND DUMBER.

Oh yeah, I can't WAIT to see Ryan debate Biden . . . talk about death by a thousand cuts. Biden will be nothing but a puddle on the ground by the time Ryan gets through with him.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!